Addendum

H


Hager, Philip. "A Cat Called Jesus." Progressive, 30(4):31-33, April 1966. H1

The public furor in San Diego, Calif., caused by a play, A Cat Called Jesus, written by a high school drama teacher. When the school board refused to take action against her the California State Department of Education crudentials committee sat in judgment, questioned the teacher's qualifications to continue in the teaching profession, but found no legal ground for punishment.


Haigh, F. H. "The Indecent Publications Act 1963 and Censorship." Landfall, 68:379-83, December 1963. H2

Comparison of the British Act with that of New Zealand.


Haiman, Franklyn S. "Legal and Social Limitations on Freedom of Communication." Grassroots Editor, 8(1):9-12, January- February 1967. H3

Despite a remarkable degree of freedom existing in America today there are still limitations. He cites the Supreme Court ruling against Ralph Ginzburg, the self- censorship in radio and television broadcasting, and the public's lack of sympathies with dissenters over Vietnam. He calls for efforts to "narrow the cultural gap between those who understand what freedom of communications is all about and those who do not."


Haldeman- Julius, Emanuel. "The Blight of Censorship and Intolerance in the 'Movies."' Haldeman- Julius Monthly, 1:3-10, December 1924. H4

An attack on censorship which "robs the movies of virtually every vestige of freedom save that of the indiscriminate throwing of pies." He describes the curious and idiotic inconsistencies of state and city censors, performing in the area of sex and patriotism.


Haley, James O. "Fair Trial and Free Press." Alabama Lawyer, 27:374-87, October 1966. H5

"The Irwin, Rideau, Estes and Sheppard decisions, all handed down since 1960, reflect a growing awareness by the Supreme Court that the news media can represent a serious threat to the orderly administration of criminal justice. The latter two cases have greatly strengthened the right of the accused to be free from prejudicial outside interference during his trial."


Halloran, J. D. "TV Violence." Censorship, 4(2):15-21, Autumn 1966. H6

The article considers what is known, through research, of the effects on the child of violence and aggression in television programs. The author stresses the need for media education and for support of those creative people in the television industry who, given a change in the existing system of control, would present less stereotyped material.


Hamlin, William R. "Trial by Newspaper: Should It Continue?" Kentucky Law Journal, 54:141-54, Fall 1965. H7

"The answer must come, if at all, from the legislatures through the enactment of a law preventing the printing of certain types of prejudicial information, along with the use ofthe contempt power by a wise and intelligent judiciary."


Hanson, Arthur B. "Developments in the Law of Libel: Impact of the New York Times Rule." William and Mary Law Review, 7:215-23, May 1966. H8

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964).


Harlan, Robert D. "David Hall and the Stamp Act." Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, 61:13-37, First quarter 1967. H9

The effect of the Stamp Act crisis of 1765-66 on the career of a Philadelphia printer.


Harrigan, Anthony. "The Surrender of Privacy." Nieman Reports, 12:6-8, July 1958. H10

The growing invasion by agencies of the federal government, poll takers, television cameras, and newspaper photographers prying into human emotions, is a threat to the privacy of the American citizen.


Harrison, John M. "The Press vs. The Courts." Saturday Review, 38(42):9-10, 35, 15 October 1955. H11

How sensational coverage of a case by the press injures a defendant's right of trial by jury.


Hartz, F. R. "Combatting Library and Textbook Censorship in Schools." Clearing House, 41:264-67, January 1967. H12


Harum, Albert E. "Free Press, Fair Trial Controversy." Florida Bar Journal, 40:231-39, April 1966. H13

Since the use of discretion by the trial judge is a major factor in resolving this conflict, "bar and media alike should bring their powerful forces to bear on seating judicious, learned, and unassailable judges."


Harvey, Arthur. "The Right of Privacy in Fields of Communication and Entertainment." Intramural Law Review of New York University, 8:129-53, January 1953. H14

"The plan of the paper is to outline briefly the history of the right of privacy beginning with the incidents leading to the passage of the New York Right of Privacy Statute, and continuing to a comparison of a number of decisions under the statute with holdings in jurisdictions which recognize a common law right of privacy, in an attempt to determine whether any consistent pattern can be found and definite rules established."


Harvey, C. P. "Fair Trial v. Free Press A British Lawyer's View." Los Angeles Bar Bulletin, 42:109-13, January 1967. H15


Harvey, Joseph M. "Trial by Newspaper." Nieman Reports, 11(2):18-19, April 1957; 11(3):3-4, July 1957. H16

Taken from a talk made to the Boston Bar Association.


Hastings, Patrick. "Libel and Slander." In his Cases in Court. London, Heinemann, 1949, pp. 22-106. H17

This chapter recounts six celebrated British libel cases in which the lawyer- author participated, together with brief commentary on the law of libel: Princess Irena Alexandrovna Youssupoff (the Rasputin film), Robert Sievier (race track libel), Harold Laski (Newark Advertiser), Mr. Chapman (Racing Calendar), Mr. Lambert (B.B.C.), and Mr. Blennerhassett ("Yo- Yo" case against the Evening Standard).


Havighurst, Clark C., ed. "International Control of Propaganda." Law and Contemporary Problems, 31:437-637, Summer 1966. H18

Symposium on the present state of international propaganda and what can be done to "curb the worst abuses to achieve controls in peripheral tension spots, and to reduce even slightly the risks of war inflamed by propaganda."


-------. "Privacy." Law and Contemporary Problems, 31:251-435, Spring 1966. H19

A symposium on privacy as a single right entitled to protection against a variety of conflicting interests." Includes articles on The Right to Privacy and American Law by William M. Beaney; Privacy and the Law: A Philosophical Prelude by Milton R. Konvitz; Privacy: Its Constitution and Vicissitudes by Edward Shils; Some Psychological Aspects of Privacy by Sidney M. Jourard; Philosophical Views on the Value of Privacy by Glenn Negley; Privacy in Tort LawWere Warren and Brandeis Wrong? by Harry Kalven, Jr.; "The Files": Legal Controls Over the Accuracy and Accessibility of Stored Personal Data by Kenneth L. Karst; Privacy in Welfare: Public Assistance and Juvenile Justice by Joel F. Handler and Margaret K. Rosenheim; and The Privacy of Government Employees by William A. Creech.


Hawkins, Gordon J. "Problem of Pornography." Sydney Law Review, 5:221-38, September 1966. H20

The author poses the question: "Shall any limits be imposed on the writer's freedom to present and dwell on sexual detail?" He states the case for and against censorship. In the final section he considers the question, Can Pornography Be Literature?


Hayes, John C. "A Position on the Control of Obscenity." Kentucky Law Journal, 51:641-55, Summer 1963. (Erroneously published under the name of John C. Levy) H21

The position of the author is that obscene publications "exert a substantial adverse effect on public morality and must, therefore, be controlled." Since legal controls can be only minimal, "extra- legal control by private agencies of society which are non- officially concerned with the public welfare and which themselves act only withhin the law is necessary for the common good." The author is dean of the School of Law, Loyola University and, since 1958, legal consultant to the National Office for Decent Literature.


-------. "The Recent Obscenity Cases before the Supreme Court." NODL Newsletter, 11(1):1-6, Summer 1966. H22

Regarding the Ginzburg, Mishkin, and Fanny Hill cases.


Headingley, Adolph S. The Biography of Charles Bradlaugh. 2d ed. London, G. P. Varma, 1889. 332p. H23


Healey, John R. The Calfornia Press and the Brown Act. Los Angeles, University of California, 1964. 77p. (Unpublished Master's thesis) H24

The Brown Act provides for open access to public records.


[Hefher, Hugh M.]. The Playboy Philosophy, Ill. [Chicago, Playboy Magazine, 1964], pp. 100-158. H25

Installments thirteen through eighteen of editorials by Editor Hefner, appearing in Playboy magazine. The editorials deal with aspects of sexual morality and individual freedom, with considerable attention to anti- sexuality in America. Very little deals explicitly with censorship.


[-------]. The Playboy Philosophy, IV. [Chicago, Playboy Magazine, 1967], pp. 159-94. (Index for series, pp. 95-98) H26

Installments nineteen through twenty- two of Editor Hugh M. Hefner's editorials present a panel discussion on the American Sexual Revolution. Panelists are: Father Norman J. O'Connor, Roman Catholic priest; Reverend Richard E. Gary, Episcopal minister; Rabbi Marc H. Tannenbaum; and Editor Hefner. Topics discussed include sex and the mass media, freedom of and from religion, the nature of obscenity, protecting the young, a censor- free society, self- censorship, and pornography and delinquency. Plans call for publication of the completed series in book form.


Helwig, Gilbert J. "Fair Trial versus Free Press: Must We Choose?" Judicature 50:149-52, January 1967. H27

"There is no sensible reason why an increased sensitivity to the rights of defendants in criminal cases demands any reduction in our sensitivity for a free press . . . Our goal should be no less than to be both fair and free."


-------. "Should Special Facilities Be Provided for Courtroom Photography and Broadcasting?" Judicature, 50:163-67, January 1967. H28

In the planning of courtrooms we should not omit provision for the intelligent and effective use therein of photography and broadcasting facilities.


Hennion, Reeve L. A Survey of the Ralph M. Brown Act. Palo Alto, Calif., Stanford University, 1965. 94p. (Unpublished Master's thesis) H29

The Brown Act provides for open access to public records.


Herndon, James. "Sheppard v. Maxwell: The Sufficiency of Probability." North Dakota Law Review, 43:1-16, Fall 1966. H30

Relating to Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, and the issue of pretrial publicity.


Herr, Dan. "Catholics, Censorship, and Common Sense." U.S. Catholic, 31:39-41, September 1965. H31

"Catholics have not always taken a sensible stand on the problem of censorship." Dan Herr offers his ideas on how to avoid excesses for and against freedom of expression.


Herron, Russell L. Freedom of the College Press: A Moral and Educational Justification. Urbana, Ill., University of Illinois, 1963. 59p. (Unpublished Master's thesis) H32


H[ess] T. B. "Art, Government and Dirty Books." Art News, 65(3):25, May 1966. H33

An editorial satire, suggesting government subsidy for free dirty books, prompted by the Supreme Court decision. It isn't so much what is sold as how it is sold. "The `panderers' . . . are urged, under the penalty of a stiff jail sentence, to wipe the `prurient leer' . . . off their faces before they undertake to peddle their wares.'


[Hewitt, Cecil R.]. "The Literary Censorship in England." Kenyon Review, 29:401-22, June 1967. Written under the pseudonym, C. H. Rolph. H34

A statement on the British Obscene Publications Act of 1959 as it has been administered, the present climate of public feeling about obscenity, and the current trends among publishers and booksellers. The author discusses the proposal of a "publishers' censorship board," the so- called "Cleanup TV" campaign, and observes that the English theater "is on the point of getting rid of the Lord Chamberlain as its censor." While grudging complete freedom to the "septic scribblers" he believes that prosecution of books and pictures under the criminal law is "both pathetic and ridiculous."


[Heywood, George B.]. Abel Heywood, Abel Hey wood & Son, Abel Heywood & Son, Ltd., 1832-1932. [Manchester, Eng., The Company, 1932?]. 7p. H35

In this brochure issued on the occasion of the centennial of this wholesale news agency, the present head recounts the experience of his grandfather, Abel Heywood, imprisoned in 1832 for distributing the Poor Man's Guardian in defiance of the Newspaper Stamp Act.


Hibschman, Harry. "Sex in American Law." Modern Thinker, 1:175-85, May 1932. H36

Includes examples of curious legal interpretations of the obscenity laws including an 1877 statement of the Indiana Supreme Court tracing common law of obscenity back to Adam and Eve.


Hildebrand, Berthold. Der Gedanke der Pressefreiheit im offintlichen Recht En glands. Eine Studie uber ein Grundprinzip des volkssouverdnen Staates und Mittel gesellschaftlichen Fortschritts. Singen S. H., Oberlander 7eitung, 1932. 132p. (Heidelberg, Jur. Diss., 1932) H37


Hill, Gladwin. "Free Press and Fair Trial - The Witch Hunt." Frontier, The Voice of the New West, 18(3):19-21, January 1967. H38

The writer concludes that trials are for the benefit of society, not for the defendant, and that the "peoples' right to know" is paramount.


Hills, Lee. "Free Press AND Fair Trial." Nieman Reports, 20(2):15-17, June 1966. H39

The author, executive editor of Knight Newspapers, believes that free press versus fair trial is not a major problem, that the issue arises in a comparatively few sensational cases.


-------. "Justice by Daylight Law and Press Are Allies, Not Antagonists." Oklahoma Bar Association Journal, 37:1023-27, 28 May 1966. H40

"It seems self- evident that justice is more likely to be done in the light of day than in the dark."


Hiner, James. "Remembering Eros." Trace, 1966-67:481-83, Fall-Winter 1966-67. H41

A reader of Eros criticizes the Supreme Court decision in the Ginzburg case.


Hofland, J. A. "The Fight Against the Horror Comics." Gazette: International Journal of the Science of the Press, 1:123-24, 1955. H42

Review of action taken in the United States, Great Britain, West Germany, France, and the Netherlands.


Hofstadter, Samuel H. The Development of the Right of Privacy in New York. Edited by George Horowitz. New York, Grosly Press, 1954. 92p. H43

Includes a reprinting of the classic Warren- Brandeis article on the right of privacy.


-------, and Shirley R. Levittan. "No Glory, No Beauty, No Stars-Just Mud." New York State Bar Journal, 37:38-47, February 1965; 37:116-25, April 1965. H44

"The line to be drawn between pornography and art, obscenity and literature, is often surrounded by fog. Our readers will find this article . . . sheds new light on a subject now receiving a great deal of judicial attention."


-------. "Obscenity; Roth v. United States; Summary." Catholic Lawyer, 11:225-27, Summer 1965. H45


Hogan, R. F. "Book Selection and Censorship." Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, 51:67-77, April 1967. H46


Holbrook, David. "Enlightenment or Demoralisation? Literature and the New Morality." Twentieth Century, 175:24-26, Summer 1966. H47

"I recognize censorship as a danger . . . I also believe that a degree of censorship is inevitable. The reason why I believe this is that some human beings have an impulse to harm others, and that we have a problem of hate. . . . The utterance of mind sex, in pornography and near pornography for instance, is both lucrative, and a means of satisfying the unconscious impulse to build one's own identity at the expense of others." The liberal mind is a victim of good- natured belief in human nature, ignoring the destructive evil of hate in sex- expression.


Holley, Ira H. "Obscenity Law - The Bane of the Courts." Criminal Law Bulletin, 1(6):3-26, July-August 1965. H48


Hollis, Christopher. "The Roman Index." History Today, 16:712-19, October 1966. H49

On 14 June 1966 the Vatican announced the abolition of the Index of Prohibited Books the forerunner of which began in the year 405. The article constitutes a brief history of the Index.


Holmes, John C. "The Last Cause." Evergreen, 44:28-32, 9399, December 1966. H50

Personal recollection of the author's association in New York with Gershon Legman, book collector and student of erotica and sex literature.


Holmes, Joseph L. "Crime and the Press." Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 20:6-107, May and August 1929. H51

Newspaper abuses in reporting crime and divorce cases can be met in part by a journalist code of ethics and in part by legislation limiting the press to a mere statement of facts of a crime or divorce case without discussion or pictures.


Hood, Stuart. "Two Approaches." Censorship, 2(4):2-5, Autumn 1966. H52

Contrast in the extent of formal censorship of television in Great Britain between B.B.C. and I.T.V. There is whithin the B.B.C no written code or formal machinery ofeensorship; B.B.C. operates under a very liberal charter which leaves it free to manage its own affairs. The position ofI.T.V. differs radically, governed by terms of an Act which requires I.T.V. to serve as watchdog over the companies. In order to discharge its duties, I.T.V. has set up a machinery for censorship.


Hoover, J. Edgar. "Combating Merchants of Filth: The Role of the FBI." University of Pittsburg Law Review, 25:469-78, March 1964. H53

"It is essential that high standards of decency be zealously maintained in every phase of community life; for to lower the barriers of good taste and moral acceptability in any way - and in the highly vulnerable fields of entertainment, literature and art in particular - is to invite an eventual floodtide of moral corruption and spiritual decay."


-------. "The Fight against Filth." American Legion Magazine, 70(5):16-18, 48-49, May 1961. H54

The director of the FBI describes the obscenity business in America, its harmful effect on youth, and advises on how the citizen can protect his family and community against obscenity.


Huggins, Roy B. "The Bloodshot Eye: A Comment on the Crisis in American Television." Television Quarterly, 1(3):6-22, August 1962. H55

"Huggins suggests that government control of television is a frightening reality. Not only will such interference in programming wash out the fertile acreage commercial television has nurtured, it will leave behind only a thin residual of the silt of conformity, to be tilled inexpertly by nervous licensees and apprehensive program entrepreneurs as they await the next cultural decree from `The State.'"


Hunnings, Neville M. "Censorship of Lantern Slides." Cinema Studies, 2:38, June 1966. H56

A brief note on Canadian legislation of 1912 to bring slides within the film censorship law.


-------. Film Censors and the Law. Foreword by Frede Castberg. London, Allen & Unwin, 1967. 474p. H57

A comprehensive study of comparative law in the censorship of films in England, the United States, India, Canada, Australia, Denmark, France, and Russia. Appendix contains a list of presidents and secretaries of the British Board of Censors, a list of "x" films distributed, T. P. O'Connor's 43 rules, tables of statutes, and tables of films. Bibliography.


-------. "The Silence of Fanny Hill" Sight and Sound, 35:134-38, Summer 1966. H58

The author observes that film censorship and criminal obscenity "have all but fallen in the United States and Scandinavia, and strong liberalizing tendencies can be seen in Britain too." He describes the recent liberalizing tendencies in film and theater censorship in Britain and summarizes events in the United States, Sweden, Denmark, Canada, and New Zealand.


Hunter, Edward. Attack by Mail. Linden, N.J., Bookrnailer, 1966. 252p. H59

An attack on American policy which permits free flow of Communist propaganda into the United States.


Huntley, R. E. R., and C. F. Phillips, Jr. "Community Antenna Television: A Regulatory Dilemma." Alabama Law Review, 18:64-81, Fall 1965. H60

"The need for regulation seems insistent, and yet the only convenient criteria for regulatory policy are those drawn from the existing pattern of the industry - criteria which will necessarily yield a policy tending to solidify the existing pattern in perpetuity."


Hyatt, William D. "Fair Trial v. Free Press: The Need for Compromise." University of Cincinnati Law Review, 34:503-24, Fall 1965. H61

"The inescapable conclusion seems to be that the British system of suppressing publicity during the pendency of a criminal trial affords an accused in Britain a substantially fairer trial than his American counterpart, and the American system of dealing with prejudicial publicity, in its present form, is inadequate to afford an accused a fair trial in the face of heavy news coverage."


Hyman, Lawrence W. "Obscene Words and the Function of Literature." College English, 28:432-34, March 1967. H62

The author attempts to explain why college students feel impelled to use shocking scenes and obscene language in their college literary efforts, which prompt censorship action.


Go back to Table of Contents

Go to Addendum for I


Comments: Web Administrator

Privacy Policy Last Updated